I find it hard to believe that here in Canada and the US we have to worry about losing our right to free speech. But he comes, and he comes fasting for my comfort. Those in charge have been taking away our rights to freedom of expression little by little, through the use of subliminal methods. Convince a large part of the population that certain speeches must be controlled and suppressed for the public good.

A good example of this suppression would be writing that I found a cure for cancer, and that the cure is a substance found in nature called vitamin B17, laetrile, or amygdalin. And that this substance is found in raw nuts and in the pits of many fruits, particularly apricot kernels or pits. I would be breaking the law. By law I am supposed to say something to the effect that this is just my opinion, and that you should consult with your GP.

The truth is, your doctor knows nothing about medicine, except how to diagnose your problem and write you a prescription for the chemical formula, to promote Big Pharma’s coppers. The people who run this world are very rich and plan to keep it that way.

They own the pharmaceutical companies, the media, energy and public services. They want nothing, getting in the way of their profits. They don’t like people blurting out things that will cure you of something like cancer. Cancer is big business that makes the super-rich around the world trillions of dollars. They sure don’t want a cure for that. Well, there is much more than cancer cures involved in this hoax.

So how do you keep things like a cure for cancer? You start by shutting people like me up. They tell the population, don’t listen to people who talk crazy things like cures for cancer. So they have their puppet politicians write laws that force me to lie, saying that this cure I am talking about is not a cure and it is not proven, that you need to consult with your doctor.

Do you feel that you are mentally incompetent and that you need other people to decide what is safe for you to read and believe? In all likelihood, your drivers are probably right, and you shouldn’t be reading this.

On the other hand, if you feel you are competent enough to decide for yourself what is okay for you to read and what is not. And you don’t need anyone else to help you make this decision. My congratulations to you, because you are a rare person in today’s society, who has enough mentality left to think for yourself.

I admit to making medical claims and claiming cures in this post. I also affirm that there are a lot of people with a lot of spiritual deprivation who have lost their way to the father. These people run our world and tell the world’s governments what to do and what to say. I claim to love my neighbor, this includes the wrong people who rule this world and are following Lucifer’s lies. all human beings are my brothers and sisters. I want to save you all from the slavery of lies and deceit. I do not and will not retract anything I say. I am a firm believer in freedom of expression.

I plan to exercise free speech to its fullest extent, no matter whose pocket it hurts. I love the truth, and I hate secrets, for those who fear the truth, God help them to feel different. Some of the information I reveal in this post was given to me through the Holy Spirit, and I will not take it back in any way.

When I think of the disclaimers. I have to wonder, what are they for? Some say that the disclaimers are to protect the reader from possible false claims, which could harm the reader, that they take them seriously. I have my little theory on this.

I think disclaimers are a means to control free speech and tell the masses that it is for their protection. Because the reader may not be competent enough to be able to determine what is safe or not, to be able to make their own decisions.

I have to wonder about that statement about protecting the reader from possible false claims. Are authors required to make disclaimers to protect the reader, because the reader lacks the intellectual capacity to discern how accurate some of the statements in a publication may or may not be?

Am I to assume, as a writer, that my reader lacks the ability to judge for himself? And that the reader lacks the ability to discern what information he should accept as accurate because someone else has decided that the reader does not have the ability to do so for himself.

Doesn’t this seem a bit like big brother knows better? Especially when it might be in the best interest of the big nuisance that things be kept in the dark. Well my answer to big brother is this. I am an adult and old enough to decide what I want to read and what I want to believe. And I’m sure most of my readers are also quite capable of making these simple decisions without your input.

The problem with today’s society is that we have a small special interest group that makes decisions for other people. People who are quite capable of making decisions for themselves. To make matters worse, we have a certain section of the population that is too busy to bother with basic decision making.

It’s much easier to have someone else do this for them. The danger in all of this is, can you trust that those people who care about your every decision will look out for your best interests?

I remember as a child, sitting in the classroom, listening to the teacher tell us how lucky we all are living in a country like Canada. He went on to tell us that in communist countries like Russia, people’s lives were completely controlled by the government.

How every aspect of their lives was dictated and controlled, how they had no freedoms. How they had no freedom of expression, no freedom of religion. When I look at this country and the United States today, I think things have gotten just as bad here, if not worse.

In case you can’t find my post here anymore, just search for “Little Moses”. I will be spreading this all over the net and any other media I can think of.